<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myth: You Can&#8217;t Prove a Negative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/</link>
	<description>An eclectic blog that examines a variety of martial arts topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martial Arts News 7.10.08 &#171; Striking Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Martial Arts News 7.10.08 &#171; Striking Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/?p=380#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>[...] posts: Chi Debunked and Myth: You Can&#8217;t Prove a Negative. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Shaolin Kung Fu Show: Martial Art Kong FuMartial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts: Chi Debunked and Myth: You Can&#8217;t Prove a Negative. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Shaolin Kung Fu Show: Martial Art Kong FuMartial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpatterson67</title>
		<link>http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>bpatterson67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/?p=380#comment-653</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure. I keep losing the camera. 

~BCP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure. I keep losing the camera. </p>
<p>~BCP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodibidably</title>
		<link>http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodibidably</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/?p=380#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Does that use invisible film?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that use invisible film?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpatterson67</title>
		<link>http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>bpatterson67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/?p=380#comment-651</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d use my invisible camera. 

;)

~BCP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d use my invisible camera. </p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>~BCP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodibidably</title>
		<link>http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodibidably</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/?p=380#comment-650</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;tiny invisible elf&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
How is a camera going to help with something that is INVISIBLE?

&quot;This elf by virtue of being tiny and invisible can not be seen, touched, heard, or in an way studied through man made means.&quot;

By using this wording, it essentially becomes the same as the argument for god or a number of different pseudosciences. As we know, any time that somebody &quot;proves&quot; a specific aspect of &quot;god&quot;, psychic powers, etc is untrue, the believers use the old argument that &quot;science is not capable of studying this.

While their argument is not intellectually honest, it becomes an unfalsifiable position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;tiny invisible elf&#8221;</i><br />
How is a camera going to help with something that is INVISIBLE?</p>
<p>&#8220;This elf by virtue of being tiny and invisible can not be seen, touched, heard, or in an way studied through man made means.&#8221;</p>
<p>By using this wording, it essentially becomes the same as the argument for god or a number of different pseudosciences. As we know, any time that somebody &#8220;proves&#8221; a specific aspect of &#8220;god&#8221;, psychic powers, etc is untrue, the believers use the old argument that &#8220;science is not capable of studying this.</p>
<p>While their argument is not intellectually honest, it becomes an unfalsifiable position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icyboi</title>
		<link>http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>icyboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/?p=380#comment-649</guid>
		<description>&quot;Did you know that when you open your fridge, that tiny invisible elf turns the light on. This elf by virtue of being tiny and invisible can not be seen, touched, heard, or in an way studied through man made means. This elf also leaves absolutely no trace of it’s being in your fridge, and your fridge is “designed” to look at if electricity is being used in conjunction with a small switch to turn on the light.

Obviously this argument is complete bullshit, but can you PROVE definitively that it is bunk?
&quot;

quote from rodibidably

yes i can disprove it, just put a camera in the fridge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Did you know that when you open your fridge, that tiny invisible elf turns the light on. This elf by virtue of being tiny and invisible can not be seen, touched, heard, or in an way studied through man made means. This elf also leaves absolutely no trace of it’s being in your fridge, and your fridge is “designed” to look at if electricity is being used in conjunction with a small switch to turn on the light.</p>
<p>Obviously this argument is complete bullshit, but can you PROVE definitively that it is bunk?<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>quote from rodibidably</p>
<p>yes i can disprove it, just put a camera in the fridge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpatterson67</title>
		<link>http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/myth-you-cant-prove-a-negative/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>bpatterson67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strikingthoughts.wordpress.com/?p=380#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Yeah like I need one more thing to look like a geek!

You know, we are going at it all wrong. Considering how much energy this topic seems to create we should start our own opposing viewpoints show. 

We just need a suitable title...

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah like I need one more thing to look like a geek!</p>
<p>You know, we are going at it all wrong. Considering how much energy this topic seems to create we should start our own opposing viewpoints show. </p>
<p>We just need a suitable title&#8230;</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
